Posts

Proposed Amendment 11 - Hard NO

The final Proposed Amendment being sought by the Board is Amendment 11.  First of all, aren't ALL 28 neighborhoods in the Association unincorporated? Approval of that proposed Amendment would result in an enormous increase in power and authority in the hands of the seven-member Board of Directors or, really, in the hands for four of them (the majority). Every one of the 28 Neighborhoods is supposed to have a legitimate, duly-elected Voting Member. Over the past ten-plus years Boards have ignored that requirement. They ignored the CC&Rs and the By-Laws and allowed homeowners to "get signatures" to be called a Voting Member. Boards should have appointed competent chairpersons to the (HOA) Neighborhood Committee and told them to carry out the Mission of that Committee, which is stated on the HOA's website. And Board Presidents should have monitored whether those chairmen were carrying out that order. (They weren't.) The two most-recent chairmen did absolutely no...

July 7 Board Meeting - a Train Wreck

It's a good thing that The Summit's HOA Board Meetings are not live-streamed for the whole community to watch. Last night's meeting was a train wreck.  During the first 30 minutes there was a noisy child who interfered with the meeting. It's nice that the parent wanted to attend the meeting. The Board President should have addressed the parent at the child's first whimper.  Law Enforcement's dog-and-pony show was far too long; it was entertaining at times, but too long. Limited them to five minutes, including audience questions. Previously, the Board announced that questions from the audience would be taken during the public comment section. Then why do they allow questions during Committee reports?  A woman seated in the first row asked many questions and made many comments. The Board President should have shut her down until the public comment portion. Then during the public comment period a woman seated behind me raised questions about the annuity purchased b...

8 Legitimate Voting Members - Who Are They?

Does anyone know which Neighborhoods now have legitimate Voting Members? 1. Barony Place, May 2, 2026 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Why do you suppose they weren't identified in the July Summit Scoop? Has the listing of Voting Members been corrected on the website?  The answer to that question is No, because 24 Voting Members are named on the website's list. Four neighborhoods don't have any representation at all, legitimate or not. Only eight (8) Voting Members are legitimate, and not necessarily any or all of those named (except for Tracy Manderino of Barony Place). The Board has finally acknowledged that its scheme of allowing a homeowner to "get signatures" or just remain in office because they think they "own" it, is not valid. In the July 2026 Scoop (Page 3) some unnamed person wrote, "To date, eight neighborhoods have successfully completed the election process by forming a Neighborhood Committee and electing their Voting Member and Alternate."* ...

Amendment 10. NextDoor

There is an active discussion about Amendment 10 starting on NextDoor. Be sure to weigh in. First of all, the HOA should be telling the truth to Members (homeowners). Members do not vote on the proposed Amendments. It's the Voting Members who vote on them. According to the HOA, there are now eight bonafied Voting Members. There should be 28. For years, there was none. Then there was one. Now seven more in the past month (if those Neighborhood Meetings were legitimate). On NextDoor, Renee B. re-stated Proposed Amendment 10. She didn't "explain" it. What she did do was copy and paste it into NextDoor. It is a terrible Amendment. Why should Buyers be penalized for failures of past Boards of Directors? No Buyer is going to pay that. A savvy Buyer will demand that the Seller take the hit on the $1,000. Plus that proposed amendment opens the door for increases voted by the Board! Do you want only four people (a majority on the Board) to make a decision for 2,480 Members? ...

Why does Gus Keep Pounding on the Board of Directors?

I (Gus Philpott) am sometimes asked why I keep pounding away on the Board of Directors. The answer is simple. When that illegal lawsuit against me was dropped in January (2026), I offered to be fair with the HOA if they were fair with me. I had rejected conditions offered by the HOA. They caved, and they dismissed the lawsuit with no agreements between us. In fact, they dismissed it with prejudice, meaning they couldn't re-file it. I asked for a meeting with the Board of Directors. The Board President told me they were not going to offer a settlement. Had I asked for a settlement? No, I asked for a "meeting". Were they fair with me? No.  I happen to enjoy writing the posts on this blog. I've been studying the CC&Rs and By-Laws for more than six years. If the Boards had conducted the business of the HOA in compliance with the CC&Rs and By-Laws, they would have heard little from me and there would have been a different tone to my writings. They have earned every...

July 2026 Scoop - What's Missing?

The July 2026 Summit Scoop was distributed today, July 2nd, by email from the office at 5:58PM. What's missing? The Voting Members' list. Why would that list be left out? Could it be because an accurate list would include the names of only eight (8) legitimate Voting Members? There are 28 neighborhoods,  and each should have a genuine Voting Member. Proposed Amendment 1 is designed to do away with the Voting Members. Read it carefully. Vote NO on Amendment 1. In this same July Scoop (Page 3) in place of a list of Voting Members, it states, in part, "To date, eight neighborhoods have successfully completed the election process by forming a Neighborhood Committee and electing their Voting Member and Alternate ( should read Alternates ). An additional five neighborhoods have scheduled their annual meetings to conduct elections." Unfortunately, those who publish The Summit Scoop failed to identify the seven new neighborhoods that have come into compliance (finally) with t...

HOA Bad Debt

On January 1, 2026 the Annual Assessment of the Association increased $50 to $560.00, payable in two installments of $280.00. Two thousand four hundred eighty (2,480) property owners were billed for a total of $694,400.  How many of them have paid? How many have NOT paid? What portion of the $694,400 has not been received by the Association? Amounts unpaid on February 1st were past-due and began incurring penalties and interest. Does the Board even know? Will the Treasurer report on July 7? How is the new Collection Policy of the Association working out? In fact, WHAT is the new Collection Policy (announced 5/5/2026)? Members deserve to be informed. It's not a secret. Assessments are a financial obligation of homeowners (Members). Assessments should be paid on-time and in full. The July 1st Assessment (second half) has been billed. What amount does the Association reasonably expect to collect? It appears that the Board never approved the 2026 Proposed Budget, which is posted on the...

Watch out, Folks. Amendment #10. Vote NO.

 At 4:55PM today, the HOA office emailed "information" about Amendment No. 10,  Capital Contribution Assessment. That email was sent out on behalf of The Summit Community Board of Directors. The Directors are Brenda Bryant, Noel Weatherbee, Angelo Turley-Moore, Linda Potter, Jeff Lummel, Tanisha Holmes, and William Hill. Notably, the attachment was titled, " Why Vote YES on Amendment 10? " (Bold and capitalized YES were in the original.) Think: why is this Amendment so important to the Board? Because The Summit's HOA is running out of money. Over the past few years several boards of directors have collected money and budgeted for Reserves. They silently reduced the Reserve Contribuition and spent your money on operations. I have covered that in other articles here. In 2020 the Contribution to Reserves was budgeted at $163,965. In 2024  the Contribution to Reserves was budgeted at $0.00. Did your Annual Assessment ($510/year) go down? No! In 2025  the Contributio...

Where Did the Cash Go?

Where did $784,041.41 go in four years? When the 12/31/2025 Financial Operating Results were finally posted this week, it was possible to calculate the shrinkage in Total Assets over a four-year period. The year-end Total Assets are shown below for five years (2021-2025). The amount in parentheses is the reduction in Total Assets in that one year. $1,872,391.80 - 12/31/2021 $1,837,205.30 - 12/31/2022 (-$35,186.50) $1,596,952.66 - 12/31/2023 (-$240,252.64) $1,535,754.14 - 12/31/2024 (-$61,198.52) $1,087,350.39 - 12/31/2025 (-$448,403.75) $35.186.50+$240,252.64+$61,198.52+$448,403.75= $785,041.41 In four years the Total Assets shrank $785,041.41. Note that they shrank $448,403.75 in just one year, from 12/31/2024 to 12/31/25. The Board must explain this to the Members. The Board had three treasurers in 2025. LaToya Adams (1/1/25 to mid-May), (no Treasurer from mid-May to 7/1/25), William Hill (7/1/25-12/1/25), Linda Potter (12/1/25-12/31/25). Danny Trapp was Board President from 1/1/25-...

BOD Meeting: Tues., July 7, 2026

The next scheduled, Regular monthly Board of Directors meeting will be Tuesday, July 7, 2026. Be ready with your questions. Only four months remain under the next election of directors. After the July meeting, there will be only one meeting (September) before the Annual Meeting of Voting Members. The Board should return to monthly board meetings! There should be 28 legitimate, duly-elected Voting Members. Ask how many there are on July 7th and for which neighborhoods. If there aren't 15 by November, the HOA will again be unable to conduct a bonafide election.  And there will have to be more than 15 legitimate, duly-elected Voting Members, if the Voting Members are to vote on the proposed Amendments to the CC&Rs and the By-Laws. There must be enough legitimate Voting Members to represent 75% of the 2,480 Members. This means the HOA must know how many properties are in each neighborhood. In June 2024 the office told me that there were 2,515 homes, which was 115 (4.6%) more homes...

What is the HOA's New Collection Policy?

At the May 5, 2026 monthly Board Meeting, there was a very brief mention of a new Collection Policy of the Association. No details were provided, and none has been distributed to Members. Where can Members read the new Collection Policy? The Board had stopped publishing monthly Financial Operating Results, so it was impossible to know how much the Accounts Receivable (unpaid Assessments and unpaid fines and fees) totaled. Until this week the last Results published were for August 2025. The May 2026 monthly Financial Operating Results report that Line 1205, Accounts Receivable, totals $447,622.09. Has an ageing report been delivered to the Board? The Allowance for Bad Debts (Line 1210) totals $274,895.19. Is that total any better than a guess? Should all of that be written off? Has a Bad Debt analysis been conducted to determine the likelihood of collecting any of it? The HOA (Board) has any obligation to Members to collect past-due Assessments, fines, and fees. Why should Members-in-go...

Now Available! Financial Results Through May 2026

Imagine my surprise just now (6/30/26 10:40AM) when I found that the Financial Operating Results (FOR) for September, October, November, December 2025 and January, February, March, April, and May 2026 have been published on the HOA's website! Members should be sure to examine some of these. There will a story told there. You'll miss the story, of course, because the FORs do not include one of the most-valuable columns of a financial report. That column is the Percent-of-Change. Be sure to print the May 2026 FOR or save it as a .pdf  Save the other months' FORs, too. There are questions to be asked: Why is there so little money in "Bank Accounts"? Under Investment Accounts, is all of this Reserves? What is the Actual Net Cash Value of the Annuity? What does "unreconciled" mean? Are the Investment Accounts titled "BOD"? Why aren't these in the name of the HOA? What is the interest rate on the CDs? Why is Accounts Receivable (Line 1205) stil...

Kiss June Good-bye - - - No Summit Scoop

The Board of Directors missed a real opportunity to explain the proposed amendments to the CC&Rs and the By-Laws to Members of the Association. They could have used the June Summit Scoop to explain the changes that they would like to see made. However, I wonder whether they would have pointed out that a number of the proposed changes are NOT in the best interest of the Members, starting with the very first amendment. Not enough information is provided to Members. Do you want The Summit to look like a trailer park? Increasing storage shed size to 16x16x12 feet and allowing plastic or resin siding and metal roofing could cause housing values to plummet. Imagine such a monstrosity in the yard next door. Allowing vinyl fencing and fence heights of 8 feet is another disaster in the making. And paving over a front yard to increase driveway width to three cars? Crazy! The sleeper in the group is Amendment 10 - Capital Contribution Assessment. Why would you ever allow the Board of Director...

Should Amendments Project Be Halted?

In response to the HOA's email today about Item 1 in the proposed amendments, I have emailed the following Open Letter to the Association's office for the attention of the seven board members. TO: HOA Board Members (Summit Community Association, Inc. (29229)) How is the incompetence associated with this process even possible? Board members, committees, and staff who created this nightmare should be identified to all Members, so that homeowners know exactly who is responsible. You fail to inform Members that a quorum for a VM meeting (51%) cannot amend the CC&Rs or the By-Laws or take many other actions.  You fail to inform Members that they do not vote on amendments to the CC&Rs and By-Laws. Your shed size of 16'x16'x12' is absurd! The Summit will resemble a trailer park, if larger or  plastic/resin sheds are allowed. Property values will plummet. Same with metal roofs, vinyl and 8-foot fences, expanded driveways, artificial turf. The plug should be pulled ...

What is the Board's Job?

The job of the Board of Directors is to govern The Summit's HOA in compliance with the CC&Rs, the By-Laws, and the established Guidelines, such as the Procedures Reference Manual. An important part of that job is to represent and protect the interests of the Members (homeowners) of the Association. Sometimes, it might be necessary to step on someone's toes; e.g., the toes of current or past board  members. If that is necessary to protect the interests of the Members, then the Board must do it. When Association funds have been mishandled, somebody must be held accountable. Money can be moved out of Reserves only for specific, authorized purposes. Too much money has been moved around without the required paper trail (Minutes and Resolutions) for withdrawals and purpose!!! Where did $445,000 go from Reserves between 1/31/25 and 1/31/26? Why haven't Financial Operating Results been posted on the HOA's website since August 2025 ? The HOA spent $25,-$30,000 from December ...

"Official" Proposed Amendments?

On June 19, 2026 the office sent out proposed amendments to the CC&Rs and the By-Laws by email. The email indicated that the proposed amendments were also being sent out by U.S. Mail. Those sent by U.S.Mail have not been delivered to at least one long-time HOA member. Have you received your copy by mail? Did the Board of Directors approve those proposed amendments? Did the Board authorize the office to send out that email over its name? Presumably, it did. Who gave the direction to distribute the proposed amendments? The email doesn't say. When did the Board approve those proposed amendments? On what date? Did they do so on June  2, 2026 at the Regular Monthly Board Meeting, which was held in private ? The June Meeting, if it was held, was in the new cycle of bi-monthly meetings.   No Minutes of that meeting have been distributed. What's the secret? How many Board members were at that meeting? Who voted for approving those proposed amendments? Who voted against? What...

Wrong Advice from BOD and the Office

In its June 19th email to all Members (at least, all who have registered email addresses), the Board and the office gave erroneous advice for the return of the "ballots" on proposed amendments to the CC&Rs and the By-Laws. The Board and the Office direct Members to return the "ballots" to the office. This is WRONG . The Governing Documents instruct that such ballots should be returned to the Voting Members. Why should they go to the Voting Members and not to the office? Because it is the Voting Member who votes on amendments to the CC&Rs and the By-Laws, not the Members. Another and more important reason is that the Governing Documents say that is where they should go. The authors of the Governing Documents recognized the power of their words. Were they worried about how a management office or a Board might handle such "ballots"?  The ballots should not go through the office on the way to the Voting Members. The office cannot even publish The Summi...

Critique - Proposed Amendment 1

The Summit's HOA Board of Directors is proposing changes to some of the CC&Rs and the By-Laws. I've been reading and studying the Governing Documents for more than six years. I know them better than most of the Board Members. Amendment 1 -  Voting Structure.  The Board is offering a suggestion to trash the current "Voting Member" structure and replace it with a structure that would allow the Members (2,480 homeowners) to amend the Governing  Documents and to elect Directors. This is a terrible idea.  First, the processes for amending the Governing  Documents and for electing directors are different in major ways. Allowing homeowners to do either would result in ignorant (know the definition) and uninformed voters to make important decisions. Not that Voting Members are necessarily not ignorant or informed. Some of them are neither.  Most of the homeowners wouldn't even bother to vote, so who would make the decisions? The current method is just fine. The...

Dues Notice Correction

Which Board Member is responsible for the error in the letter sent out by the HOA with the July 1st dues notice? It's bad enough that the management company made  the error. That never should have happened. But certainly a Board Member should have been responsible for proof-reading the letter/email before it was sent out. The important  part of the email from the office was: Please see the following regarding online payment. The information on your statement is correct, but the cover letter has an incorrect Association ID If you choose to pay through the Association’s bank, Western Alliance Bank, you may use the link below. There is currently no fee for payments made by eCheck; however, there is a fee for debit and credit card payments. https://pay.westernalliancebank.com/home?cmcid=C830BF00 Management Company ID: 7529 Association ID: 174 I recommend that you pay your dues in person at the office. Be sure to get a receipt. Get your Pool fob and HOA ID Card updated.  If yo...

March, May Minutes? June Scoop?

Does The Summit's HOA still have a management  company? The March 2026 Board Minutes have not been posted online. The May 2026 Board Minutes have not been posted online. The June Summit Scoop hasn't been published. No Financial Operating Results have been posted for September, October, November or December 2025 OR for January, February, March, April or May 2026! What doesn't the management company (Town & Country) post these documents? Or the Board of Directors the problem?