Board should explainn Amendments failure
The Board should explain why the Amendments failed by answering these questions. What was the procedure for approving Amendments, according to the CC&Rs ant the By/Laws? Why wasn’t that process followed? Who drew up the Proposed Amendments? Who were the Directors who voted to present them? Which directors voted against presenting them? Were those votes taken at Regular or Special Board Meetings? Or at private, closed. “secret”,non-reported board meetings, such as workshops or pre-board meetings? Why didn’t the Board explain clearly what percent of the Voting Members was needed to approve? Why did the Board mislead the Members when it asked them to approve the Amendments? )Members don’t approve Amendments. Voting Members do.) Why did the Board proceed, when there were never enough Voting Members to approve the Amendments? Did the Boatd spend any money on legal fees pertaining to those Amendments? How much?