Treasurer wants new traffic light

The Minutes of the April 5, 2022 contain this line as part of the Finance Committee's Report.

"Vernell has contacted Richland County about adding a traffic signal on Summit Parkway."

Why is that part of the Finance Committee's report? Did the Finance Committee discuss that and approve it, before Vernell contacted the County? Did he contact the County in his official capacity as Finance Committee Chair (co-chair?) or as Treasurer? Or simply as one of 2,480 (not 2,800, as he said in March) homeowners in The Summit

Adding a traffic light ought to be part of the Safety Committee's jurisdiction. It might be part of Finance secondarily, if the HOA would have to pay for it, IF the County ever approved it.

But, according to the County, Vernell asked for two traffic lights and speed humps on Summit Parkway. Did he tell the Board that? If he did, why isn't that in the Minutes?

Richland County Roads & Drainage Division is not going to install traffic lights or speed humps on Summit Parkway without first spending considerable money investigating whether they are needed or wanted.

My opinion (which is worth every bit as much as Vernell's) is that two more traffic lights on Summit Parkway will do notting to slow down speeders. And the County will never install speed humps on the Parkway.

What will slow down speeders is Photo Radar, which has been banned in South Carolina since 2009. Photo Radar would have very helpful last Tuesday, when a reckless driver in a black Nissan sedan (South Carolina license plate RXW 479) was speeding (est'd. 55MPH), making sudden and unsafe lane changes, tailgating and almost rear-ended me on Summit Parkway near May Oak Circle. (All captured on dashcam.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Annual Meeting, Barony Place Neighborhood - continued to 5/4/2024

Barony Place Neighborhood (Barony Place I and Barony Place II attempted to hold a Neighborhood Meeting this afternoon. Of the 78 homes, seventeen (17) homes were represented, and that was not sufficient to meet the quorum requirement of 26. The meeting was continued to Saturday, May 4, 2024, 1:00PM, at 44 Barony Place Circle. An effort will be made to have at least 26 homes represented in-person or by proxy. Three homeowners have volunteered to be on the Neighborhood Committee: Tracy Manderino (Barony Place II), Della Glynn (Barony Place II) and Gwen Hayes (Barony Place I). If a quorum is present on May 4th, those present, including by proxy, will elect the Neighborhood Committee. Once the Committee has been elected, it will select one of its three committee members to be the Voting Member for the next 12 months. The other two members will be Alternates. A new announcement will be distributed to your newspaper box, along with a proxy. If you will not attend Saturday's meeting, plea
Read more

Open Letter to Barony Place "Voting Member"

An open letter to the "Voting Member" of Barony Place Neighborhood. Good morning, Billie, If you and/or an Alternate attended last night's board of directors meeting, will you please send out a recap of the meeting to Ann Stirlen and me (and to all the homeowners and residents in Barony Place)? About a dozen homeowners from throughout The Summit showed up for the board meeting  at the church  last night, only to learn from one person that it had been switched to Zoom, which allowed the board to meet in secret. Many of them had not received the email from the office that the board was (illegitimately) closing the meeting to homeowners. There are only about 1,800 (73%) email addresses of the 2,480 Members in the website database. I attempted to join the meeting on Zoom, as I am Attorney-in-Fact for Ann Stirlen, but I was not admitted to the meeting. The HOA's attorney has quoted a section in the By-Laws that she believes allows the Board to close the meetings. That spec
Read more

Special Assessment Possible?

How would you feel about a $3,000 Special Assessment levied by the HOA against you and every other HOA Member (homeowner)? Article X, Section 4 in the CC&Rs allows this. Are you aware of that? Should the Board do everything possible to eliminate the possibility of such a Special Assessment? What is the Board doing that might just lead directly to such an Assessment? The HOA, by actions of the President (Justin Martin), the Treasurer (Vernell Butler, and the Safety Committee Chair (Dennis Rybicki) entered into a contact with the Richland County Sheriff's Department, effective February 1, 2023. They arranged for special patrols in the Summit at a cost of $48.00/hour. In the Special Duty Agreement is a Liability clause. It reads,  "The Requestor will hold harmless the Richland County Sheriff's Department from any and all claims or liabilities resulting from service and indemnify RCSD for any loss due to any injury of its employee unless there is a determination of neglige
Read more