Are Buzzards Circling the HOA?

Are legal buzzards circling over The Summit Community Association, Inc. (SCA)? Why would they do such a thing?

Does the SCA conduct its business in accordance with the By-Laws? What are the consequences of failing to do so?

Does the SCA have a legitimate Board of Directors? Has any of the so-called Directors read S.C. Code of Laws ¶33-31-830 - Standards of Conduct?

Does the SCA have any legitimate Officers?

Is there even one legitimate Voting Member?

Is "getting signatures" a legitimate method for selecting a Voting Member?

Has there been a vacancy on the board of directors (disregarding the fact that there is no legitimate board) since November 1, 2022, when Dennis Rybicki had to resign in order to take his seat as a Director for a new two-year term? Why wasn't his resignation announced? 

Which of the five directors from November 2021 should not be seated? 

State law (¶33-31-801(a)) requires a (legal) board of directors. 

If the State investigated the SCA (S.C. Code of Laws ¶33-31-171), what would it conclude?

Would it take over the SCA and run it?

Would it dissolve the SCA? What would happen to the $2,000,000 in the banks?

How can the SCA avoid these consequences?

Simply by complying with the By-Laws. All of them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annual Meeting, Barony Place Neighborhood - continued to 5/4/2024

Open Letter to Barony Place "Voting Member"

Special Assessment Possible?