Barony Place VM - not Legitimate?
Why would a board member wait nearly 12 months to challenge the legitimacy of the Barony Place Voting Member?
If you have been reading this blog, you know that I have written that Barony Place has the ONLY legitimate, duly-elected Voting Member - elected in compliance with the By-Laws of the HOA.
Why would a board member claim that some (all?) of the proxies at the 2025 Barony Place Neighborhood Meeting were fraudulent?
In 2024 I solicited enough proxies that a quorum of homeowners was present at the Barony Place Neighborhood Meeting.
In 2025 others and I solicited enough proxies for a quorum. I was not the named Proxy on many of them; some homeowners named a neighbor who attended the Meeting.
The proxies naming me as Proxy were used only to satisfy the requirement of enough homeowners present to conduct the Meeting. I did not vote them during the election of the Neighborhood Committee. I believed that those present in person should select the three homeowners they wanted to represent them.
To my knowledge, not one of the other 27 neighborhoods has held a Neighborhood Meeting with a quorum present, in person or by proxy. "getting signatures" is not "electing a (local) Neighborhood Committee".
Barony Place is the only neighborhood with a legitimate, duly-elected Voting Member!
Why isn't that board member pushing to populate the (HOA's) Neighborhood Committee with a chairman and members who will assist 27 neighborhoods to have legitimate, duly-elected Voting Members?
Comments
Post a Comment