What if the HOA were sued?

What could be some of the effects of a major lawsuit against the Summit's HOA?

What if a judge 

- ruled that all of the Voting Members, except the one in the Barony Place Neighborhood, were not legitimate Voting Members?

- ruled that the past 5-6 Annual Meetings of Voting Members were improperly convened (no quorum) and that the elections of directors were invalid?

- ruled that all the current directors were not duly-elected?

- ruled that none of the officers was legitimate?

- ruled that the HOA could not contract for services (legal, management, maintenance, repairs, landscaping, etc.)?

- ruled that no one was legally in charge of the HOA's cash assets of $2,000,000?

- ruled that a Trustee or Administrator had to be appointed to safeguard the assets and to run the HOA?

- ruled that the S.C. Secretary of State should dissolve the HOA and distribute its assets to other non-profit organizations?

- ruled that directors and officers should be charged with usurping, intruding into, or unlawfully holding or exercising any office in a corporation created by the authority of the State of South Carolina?

- ruled that directors and officers knew, or should have known, that what they were doing was illegal?

- ruled that the Directors' and Officers' Liability insurance carrier was excused from defending them, because of five years' worth of complaints to the HOA?

- ruled that assets (money) in the HOA could not be used to defend directors or officers?

The HOA President wrote in the May 2024 Summit Scoop, "We have a monumental hurdle to overcome financially."

Shouldn't the HOA take all possible steps to avoid being sued?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What? No trampolines?

Open Letter to Barony Place "Voting Member"

Pet Peeve #1 - Tinted License Plate Covers