Some Voting Members Are Trying
Are some "Voting Members" of The Summit's HOA acting like the Democrats in the Texas State House of Representatives? You know the ones - the ones who fled the Great State of Texas to avoid a House vote on re-districting.
By fleeing, they prevented a quorum from being present; therefore, no vote.
The "Voting Members" of The Summit's HOA aren't fleeing the State of South Carolina or even Richland County, but they aren't showing up when a Meeting of Voting Members is called. When there is no quorum, there can be no meeting.
By refusing to show up, are they violating their fiduciary responsibility to their respective Neighborhoods and those homeowners?
If the Neighborhoods knew that their Voting Members were not showing up, would they quickly hold a Neighborhood Meeting, elect a new (local) Neighborhood Committee, and elect a new Voting Member?
What would likely be the First Order of Business, if a quorum of Voting Members was present? My guess is that they'd show Danny Trapp the door. They would vote to remove him from the Board immediately and appoint a homeowner to succeed him.
Removal from the Board would end his reign as President.
Would the "new" Board schedule an immediate Special-Called Board Meeting to discuss the unapproved, prohibited lawsuit against Gus Philpott (me)? Would they stop making illegal disbursements for payments to the HOA's law firm?
Some "Voting Members" are trying. They are showing up for the Meetings.
Where is Reginald Mack, chairperson of the HOA's Neighborhood Committee, in all this? His Committee's Mission is to assist the Neighborhoods to hold elections and come up with duly-elected Voting Members. Let me add here, duly-elected Voting Members who will do their jobs and represent their neighborhoods!
Comments
Post a Comment