S.C. Should Establish a State HOA Office
Watch this short (two-minute) video. (Click on YouTube link.)
Should members of The Summit's HOA Board of Directors have to comply with the CC&Rs, the By-Laws, and the approved Guides of the HOA?
Should the Board have to develop a budget that meets the financial obligations of the Association?
Should their conduct be transparent?
Should all business decisions have to be made in public, open meetings, not in secret, closed, private sessions?
If they label a meeting an "executive session", should they have to follow the rules for executive sessions?
Should Voter Fraud and Banking Fraud be eliminated?
If you've been reading this blog, you know the issues I have raised with The Summit's HOA. I have encouraged the Board to get solid legal advice.
Click on Archive on the left sidebar for past content or use the Search bar (top right).
In past years I have filed complaints with the S.C. Department of Consumer Affairs, the S.C. Attorney General, the S.C. Secretary of State, SLED, Richland County Sheriff's Department.
The HOA tried to muzzle me in Circuit Court, but it failed.
The HOA's lawsuit against me is prohibited by the CC&Rs, but that didn't stop Danny and the new lawyer. So far, it has cost the HOA about $18,000, and there is no end in sight to the legal fees they will be paying out of your dues.
There is a person on the board who does not qualify. Two directors were improperly appointed on July 1. The HOA does not have a legitimate Treasurer or Secretary, in violation of State Law.
Twenty-seven neighborhoods should fix this by electing bonafide Neighborhood Committees and legitimate Voting Members before November, so that there can be an honest election of Directors on November 4, 2025.
Comments
Post a Comment