Why No Members of the (HOA's) Neighborhood Committee?

The Neighborhood Committee of the HOA is another of the most important committees. 

Its mission, found on the HOA's website is:

Responsible for helping each community in the Summit to locate and elect a local neighborhood committee that will represent their community at SCA board meetings and thereby allow their Voting member to vote on vital issues that affect the Summit and their local neighborhood. The Neighborhood Committee will assist and advise local neighborhoods with problems that they encounter.

This committee should have a chairman who understands the By-Laws and is committed to complying with them. The committee should also have members with the same commitment to compliance with the By-Laws.

The committee has a chairman. However, he has been supporting the alternate, unapproved, unauthorized, non-compliant method of finding new "Voting Members". That method is the one of "getting signatures" on a form from the office.

The  Neighborhood Committee has not challenged the Board's tolerance and recognition of "Voting Members" who have just stayed in office for years without the required Annual Neighborhood Meetings and annual elections of their respective Voting Members.

He has come up with a further alternative of email voting for Voting Members, which he explained to the Board at the February 4, 2025 Board meeting. 

In October 2021 a previous president of the HOA appointed a homeowner as chairman of the Neighborhood Committee. He did nothing to help neighborhoods come into compliance with the By-Laws or to help them elect legitimate Voting Members.

The current chair of the Neighborhood Committee says he has some people helping him, but no other homeowners or residents are named to this committee. If the committee had four members, in addition to the chairman, the Association could be divided into groups of seven neighborhoods for each committee member, and they could all have legitimate Voting Members within 60 days.

A draft of amended CC&Rs and By-Laws has been submitted to the Board. The Association will be unable to adopt the amendments, because there is only one legitimate Voting Member (Barony Place).

The other "Voting Members" are not legitimate. They were not duly-elected by their respective neighbors. This step of Election is critical, because of the legal authority the Voting Member holds in his neighborhood to commit homeowners to a dues increase of more than 10% (which is sorely needed), to a Special Assessment, and to legal action that the Association might wish to commence.

Currently, the HOA is engaged in an expensive legal action against one resident. Without Voting Member approval, that legal action is unauthorized and is prohibited. The Board of Directors did not approve it, and the Board has not approved the expense for it.

So, who should pay the expense? Not the Association. Not the Members. Should the board members have to pay it personally, since they are allowing it but never approved it?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Annual Meeting, Barony Place Neighborhood - continued to 5/4/2024

Barony Place Neighborhood (Barony Place I and Barony Place II attempted to hold a Neighborhood Meeting this afternoon. Of the 78 homes, seventeen (17) homes were represented, and that was not sufficient to meet the quorum requirement of 26. The meeting was continued to Saturday, May 4, 2024, 1:00PM, at 44 Barony Place Circle. An effort will be made to have at least 26 homes represented in-person or by proxy. Three homeowners have volunteered to be on the Neighborhood Committee: Tracy Manderino (Barony Place II), Della Glynn (Barony Place II) and Gwen Hayes (Barony Place I). If a quorum is present on May 4th, those present, including by proxy, will elect the Neighborhood Committee. Once the Committee has been elected, it will select one of its three committee members to be the Voting Member for the next 12 months. The other two members will be Alternates. A new announcement will be distributed to your newspaper box, along with a proxy. If you will not attend Saturday's meeting, plea...
Read more

Open Letter to Barony Place "Voting Member"

An open letter to the "Voting Member" of Barony Place Neighborhood. Good morning, Billie, If you and/or an Alternate attended last night's board of directors meeting, will you please send out a recap of the meeting to Ann Stirlen and me (and to all the homeowners and residents in Barony Place)? About a dozen homeowners from throughout The Summit showed up for the board meeting  at the church  last night, only to learn from one person that it had been switched to Zoom, which allowed the board to meet in secret. Many of them had not received the email from the office that the board was (illegitimately) closing the meeting to homeowners. There are only about 1,800 (73%) email addresses of the 2,480 Members in the website database. I attempted to join the meeting on Zoom, as I am Attorney-in-Fact for Ann Stirlen, but I was not admitted to the meeting. The HOA's attorney has quoted a section in the By-Laws that she believes allows the Board to close the meetings. That spec...
Read more

Special Assessment Possible?

How would you feel about a $3,000 Special Assessment levied by the HOA against you and every other HOA Member (homeowner)? Article X, Section 4 in the CC&Rs allows this. Are you aware of that? Should the Board do everything possible to eliminate the possibility of such a Special Assessment? What is the Board doing that might just lead directly to such an Assessment? The HOA, by actions of the President (Justin Martin), the Treasurer (Vernell Butler, and the Safety Committee Chair (Dennis Rybicki) entered into a contact with the Richland County Sheriff's Department, effective February 1, 2023. They arranged for special patrols in the Summit at a cost of $48.00/hour. In the Special Duty Agreement is a Liability clause. It reads,  "The Requestor will hold harmless the Richland County Sheriff's Department from any and all claims or liabilities resulting from service and indemnify RCSD for any loss due to any injury of its employee unless there is a determination of neglige...
Read more