Who gave the okay?
On the afternoon after the election of four new directors (one of whom was not Danny Trapp), the attorney for the Association filed a Supplemental Brief in the lawsuit against Gus Philpott.
The lawyer knew on Wednesday morning that Danny was no longer the President or on the Board.
The filing was titled "Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Remove Plaintiff."
Who authorized the law firm to file that Brief?
Do they do what they want or what they think is best, without permission of their Client?
Why didn't they wait for the Association to contact them and wait for instructions from the new President of the Association (who hasn't been elected yet)?
Did they contact the Board Vice-President and discuss their intention to file, which would have included billable hours for their work?
If they did, what was the response of Tanisha Holmes? Did she authorize them to proceed? If so, why didn't she wait for Board authority to so authorize?
What did that Brief cost the Association? There will be a line item in the invoice for that legal work.
Will the Board ever release a breakdown of the costs for legal action against Philpott since August 2024? Yes, August 2024. That's when the Association had its new attorney send Philpott a Cease and Desist Letter.
When Gus Philpott contacted the attorney about that Cease and Desist Letter, the attorney refused to discuss it with him, because Philpott is not a Member (homeowner) of the Association.
Could the whole matter have been resolved at that time, without a lawsuit that has cost the Association over $20,000 so far (estimated)?
Comments
Post a Comment